Showing posts with label so bad it's good. Show all posts
Showing posts with label so bad it's good. Show all posts

So Bad it’s Good: The Counselor (2013)

Copyright: 20th Century Fox
Many films demand a certain state of mind if they are to be experienced to the fullest. For the Counselor, that state of mind should be something between feeling very sleepy and being exceedingly agitated. In this golden zone of inactivity (sleep) and frantic activity fueled by anxiety and frustration (agitation), it produces a unique experience. Here, the film shines like a true diamond of total overconfidence, in spite of the fact that it was built on devastate foundations of a script that is not simply overly ambitious, but aims for the spot of a modern masterpiece. The result is a funny and pointless film, but not because of its plot holes and illogical series of events, but because it seems to believe that not many thrillers of modern time can be compared with it.

This is seen from the first moment when the basic relations are set. In it, Michael Fassbender plays a successful attorney and a man who desires to get into drug trafficking, but knows nothing of it. Javier Bardem plays Reiner, his guide on this perilous journey, who has more experience and a lot better fashion style. Together, they initiate a financial series of events that gradually summon a Mexican cartel to their lives when all begins to fall apart.

Aside from these two incredible actors, there are many other who know their craft, but nothing of this is relevant next to the script. Here, the writer, who is a brilliant man by the name of Cormac McCarthy, a man who created the masterpiece called The Blood Meridian, managed to cook up a mixture of speeches which are all twice as large as life. Everything in the film is followed by a witty narrative segment and every line is not only a punch line, but a wrecking ball when it comes to its desired impact. In every minute, some character says something worthy of Cesar or Napoleon during their most important battles, and the sheer amount of serious situations clutters everything. 

The film’s director Ridley Scott, just like in the case of Prometheus, once again fails to successfully wrestle with inadequate scripts and instead tries to glide through them, resulting in complete calamity. When the talking stops, the film switched gears into a gritty action film with bursts of Uzi automatic fire and machine-induced beheadings, which makes even less sense then the overspent cerebral approach and mastery of introspection, which is a trait of every character that appears on screen for more than one minute.

In some variations, the McCarthy’s script would work, if the setting was rural Arizona where everyone was dirt poor, but still behaved like a Harvard philosophy professor without any explanation who this came to be. Rian Johnson and his movie Brick managed to pull this off a decade ago. But when McCarthy’s work was brought to life using Scott’s blockbuster approach and set in a super-glamorous setting, it lost all meaning and become infused with presumptuousness that is rarely seen in this magnitude. Unlike other badly devised but presumptuous films like Before I Go to Sleep, this one is not flawed when it comes to its story. This is definitely a plus, but at the end, as Linking Park says, it doesn’t really matter. 

The Counselor is a hilarious concoction that can only be enjoyed as a disfigured reminder that some things don’t work well together, even if they are great separately. Also, it is a reminder that Ridley Scott really didn’t make a good film since the American Gangster.

So bad it’s good: The Hobbit - The Battle of the Five Armies

Copyright: Warner Bros. Pictures
Yes, The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies movie has a lot of things in it, or should I say a LOTR of things (I had to make that pun). It has a dragon, armies one, two, three, four and five, and possibly six and seven, but this is more a question for all those Tolkien strategy masters out there.

It has magical stones, magical rings and a whole bunch of magical riding animals, starting with wolves, and going all the way to riding mountain goats, moose and even riding pigs. In the story, characters fight evil Orks while they lose their footing, and then other characters also fight other evil Orks while they also lose their footing in a slightly different manner.

The film has all these things, including never-ending battles where swords are mostly used clubs or metal planks (hey, the budget of the film was enormous, but no one can make that many engaging/not silly sword fights) but in spite of all these things, The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies is about one thing, and one thing only – a character named Alfrid.

In short, Alfrid is a total bastard of the backstabbing kind. He is stupid, malevolent, treacherous and self-serving to an illogical and sadly comical degree. He is present throughout the film (not counting the unending last battle sequence worthy of films like Lone Survivor) and he is completely pointless. In this character, Peter Jackson demonstrated why all this stuff with Tolkien adaptation should just stop for a while and let everyone figure out what they want out of this.

This wasn’t done for the Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies film, so we got a comical piece about people fighting on plastic rocks and much more than that, about Alfrid. He is part Grima Wormtongue, part village idiot and part plain old jackass. But Jackson was glued to him like a bad horror director to a barrel of artificial blood. With Alfrid, there is nothing to be gained: we don’t see his arrival at this horrific state of total corruption (of a comical kind), and there is no redemption or resolution.

But, we do get to see him cross-dressing at one point (this was also supposed to be comical, but is much less so than Orlando Bloom’s faces when he is shooting arrows) and then he vanishes, just like any point Jackson was trying to make with these films. Compared to him, the total failure of the character Radagast in Hobbit series is a small misdemeanor.

Of course, there are many other out of place elements which make the last Hobbit film a proud entry into the So Bad it's Good category, but like the One Ring, Alfrid can truly bind all of them and rule them in the cinematographic darkness.

So bad it’s good: Bangkok Dangerous

Copyright: Lionsgate
Here is a prime example why Nicholas Cage became the stuff of memes in recent years. This film, made in 2008 is a great tribute to a unique autistic approach which he often takes in those projects that just don’t rock his boat.

Featuring a really bad haircut, which would be ideal for a hung over Columbian drug lord just waking up in 1982, Cage’s character Joe is a jaded assassin who travels to Bangkok for a series of hits. Joe obviously offers his services in bundle form and probably includes a discount in line of “buy three murders and get one free” deals. Being that he is an American, he needs someone local who can help him with deliveries and other similar petty things, so he hires Kong, a local young man who is willing to provide these services.

Pang brother directed this film, and there is definitely a bit of exotic flavor to their editing style, especially in those scenes which feature driving around the city (some even look a bit like a knockoff version of Only God Forgives). But, at the same time, there are plenty more location shots which look like a poorly made tourist advertisement which targets the middle age crowd looking to experience Thailand.

But, as the plot develops, this bad film slowly mutates into a really fun experience. Joe finds a love interested in the form of a mute pharmacist, and takes her on a series of creepy dates which include meeting her old mom. All the while, Cage continues his weird performance where he is unable to translate any kind of positive feeling of affection without looking like a confused alien who wears a human suit. Action scenes follow this trend, gradually sinking deeper into B-movie territory of warehouses and rooms filled with plastic bottles.
Directorial duo adds weight to this entertaining awfulness by inserting flashback sentences about the geo-political situation in the country (“He is a good politician, people love him” type of things) which Joe received from his faithful companion Kong. These help this bitter killer to find out that he still cares about humanity, although not enough to get a haircut.

Bangkok Dangerous, especially its second half has a lot to offer in the way of laughs and cringes to anyone who appreciates a good terrible film.